Talk:Torgny the Lawspeaker

Norse history and culture High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norse history and culture, a WikiProject related to all activities of the North Germanic peoples, both in Scandinavia and abroad, prior to the formation of the Kalmar Union in 1397. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Norse history and cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Norse history and cultureTemplate:WikiProject Norse history and cultureNorse history and culture articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 27 May 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved to Torgny the Lawspeaker. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 15:24, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Þorgnýr the Lawspeaker → Torgny Lagman or Torgny Lawman or Torgny the Lawspeaker – English as per MOS:COMMONALITY and WP:UCRN. SergeWoodzing (talk) 19:52, 27 May 2017 (UTC) I believe it has been decided elswehere, once and for all, that we use lettering in article names that are familiar to most readers of English. Thus, this article should be moved to Torgny Lagman or Torgny Lawman. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 19:47, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Torgny Lagman

Move to Torgny Lawman

Support All English. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 19:56, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Torgny the Lawspeaker

Support Just swap out "Þorgnýr" for "Torgny" and leave "the Lawspeaker" as is. Srnec (talk) 23:24, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support per WP:UE Genealogizer (talk) 17:29, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Srnec and Genealogizer. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 07:07, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Threaded discussion

I do not oppose the third option. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 18:34, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.